Skip to main content
Dutch Ministry of Justice pilots mintBlue for fraud signal exchangeRead the story

Share fraud signals with proof of origin.

Fraud crosses sectors, but each bank, webshop or carrier sees only its own piece. mintBlue lets them share signals with proof of origin and no central database.

Share fraud signals with proof of origin.

Trusted by government and industry

Belastingdienst
Ministry of Justice and Security
National Office for Identity Data
VISMA
Dockflow
NOWATCH
Sheltersuit
We have wanted to share data between our fraud portals for a long time. I did not think it could be done, but with mintBlue it simply can!

Sanne Bannink

Strategic Account Manager, Fraudehelpdesk

Fraudehelpdesk

How it connects

From signal to proof in three steps

Each organisation keeps its own data. Only the signal travels, signed by whoever shared it.

Talk to an architect
  • 01

    A connector in your own environment

    It runs next to the systems where your fraud cases are handled today, picks up the signals you choose to share and signs them at the source.

  • 02

    An event stream between departments and organisations

    Signals travel peer-to-peer to the organisations entitled to them, encrypted per field, with no broker or hub you have to trust.

  • 03

    An audit trail of every exchange

    Who shared which signal, with whom, when and on which mandate is recorded in a tamper-evident audit trail, so the receiver knows where a signal came from and a supervisor can check the exchange afterwards.

Why neither a central database nor manual sharing works

Manual sharing keeps data private, but each organisation only sees its own piece. A central platform sees everything, but every participant has to hand its data to one operator. mintBlue lets signals flow between organisations as they happen, with proof of who shared what, when and on which mandate. With multi-party computation on the same event stream, organisations can also match cases without exchanging lists.

Sharing signals with proof of origin removes that trade-off.

Manual Processes & Centralised Platforms

  • Each organisation sees only its own fraud signals
  • Privacy protection either too high (preventing legitimate sharing) or too low (vendor sees everything)
  • Who shared what, and on which mandate, is hard to reconstruct afterwards.
  • Does not scale. More authorities means more bilateral agreements and more overhead.

mintBlue

  • Signals shared between organisations, each signed by the organisation that shared it.
  • Only the signal travels; the case file stays with the organisation that holds it.
  • A tamper-evident audit trail of who shared what, when and on which mandate.
  • Scales with the number of participating organisations.
mintBlue platform illustration

Share this with your board

Fraud signals that respect the boundaries they cross

The full story on one page your board can read in a minute.

Two champion one-pagers, fraud signals and photo provenance, in one email. · Book a briefing